Red List of Mediterranean Ecosystems

How We Act 

1. Organising workshops and training to introduce the Red List of Ecosystems (RLE) methodology to member states.

• In July 2013, IUCN Med organized two different workshops in the framework of the POTCEFEX-Transhabitat project to evaluate the Moroccan Red List of Ecosystems. Scientific experts from Morocco and Spain gathered to adopt an agenda for the next steps of the project. 
  
   
• IUCN-Med organised a workshop in Lebanon in 2017 to introduce the Red List of Ecosystems methodology to stakeholders. The workshop was followed the next day by the: "National Meeting on the Conservation of Plants and Important Plant Areas in Lebanon”. which attracted participants from multiple sectors to gather and discuss the RLE methodology for conservation in Lebanon, along with a focus on the IPAMed Project.

2. Providing guidance for member states to adapting the methodology to national agendas.

• The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems methodology was presented in Tunisia for the first time in October 2017. ed through a workshop with the Directorate of Forests (DGF) and the Tunisian Ministry of Environment with a goal to assess the RLE criteria and its application to Tunisian ecosystems. 
  
   
• In 2019, IUCN-Med collaborated again with the Tunisian Ministry of Agriculture to find a common definition of ecosystem units. The goal of this assessment is to help the preservation of birds and vascular plants in the country by developing both the Red List of Ecosystems and the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™.
  
   

3. Applying the Red List of Ecosystems Methodology in the European Union

• IUCN-Med participated in the Red List of European habitats which supports the goals for The EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Although the areas are not yet part of the global assessment, they are largely based on a protocol proposed in a feasibility study, combined with elements of the IUCN RLE Approach. The collaboration resulted in the publication “European Red List of Habitats: Part 1. Marine habitats”. 

Species Conservation

The Red List of Ecosystems have the potential to complement the policy successes of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™. This is because ecosystems may more effectively represent biological diversity as a whole than individual species and can save time than performing species-by-species assessments. The Red List of Ecosystems methodology may suggest areas in which extirpations are likely to result from extinction debt in response to loss and fragmentation of species’ habitats, because a decline in the extent and status of an ecosystem may precede the loss of its species.

Resources & Human Well-being

Reliable assessments can raise awareness about threats to ecosystems and the resulting impacts on human well-being. At the same time, these demonstrate benefits to human well-being, such as how improved ecosystem management can reduce risks, enhance resilience, and promote adaptation, informing stakeholders on how to better manage finite resources. 

Categories & Criteria 

The Red List of Ecosystems evaluates whether ecosystems have reached the final stage of degradation (a state of Collapse), whether they are threatened at Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable levels, or if they are not currently facing a significant risk of collapse (Least Concern).